|
|
|
|
|
Competition and Cooperative Bargaining Models in Supply Chains
Author(s):
Source: Journal:Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management ISSN Print:1571-9545, ISSN Online:1571-9533 Publisher:Now Publishers Volume 5 Number 2, Pages: 59 (87-145) DOI: 10.1561/0200000016
Abstract: In the last two decades or so, a significant emphasis of the research literature in operations management
has been on the strategic interaction of firms in a supply chain. Individual firms in supply chains make
decisions on multiple levers such as capacity, inventory and price, to name a few, that have consequences
for the entire supply chain. In modeling strategic interactions, the operations literature has followed the
large literature in industrial organization and economics. Competition between firms in a supply chain has
largely been modeled using non-cooperative game theory and the associated concepts of equilibrium that predict
the outcomes. There are a few key differences between the industrial organization literature and the research
in operations management. First of all, the operations literature looks more at operational variables, such as
capacity and inventory, as a response to various sources of process uncertainty that any firm faces.
The preferences of individual customers, their valuations and the construction of the specific form of the
uncertainty is less of a concern (although more recent literature emphasize this). Second, the findings in
the operations literature usually have the objective of improving individual firms' (and supply chains')
profits and operational efficiencies rather than one of dictating economic policy. Third, although non-cooperative
models are the norm, there is also an underlying emphasis in the operations literature on cooperation between firms
in a supply chain to improve the overall profit of the supply chain. This is probably because, unlike the levers
traditionally studied in economics, many operational variables in a supply chain are often jointly decided between
firms. The goal of this review taps on this last sentiment. We provide an overview of some of the basic multi-firm
models studied in supply chain management. We look at how the literature uses non-cooperative game theory to analyze
these models. We then look at how some of these models can be analyzed using a cooperative bargaining framework.
We compare the modeling tools and the insights one obtains by taking this twofold approach. This process also allows
us to discuss a few topics of interest such as the relative channel power of a firm, the relative merits of using
a non-cooperative game versus cooperative bargaining to model a supply chain setting, etc. Finally, we conclude
this review by exploring some issues that remain unresolved and are topics for future research.
|
|
|
|